- Home
- Lane emissions
- Melbourne to Shanghai
Melbourne to Shanghai freight CO2 emissions
One tonne of cargo shipped Melbourne (AUMEL) to Shanghai (CNSHA) by sea emits 25.2 kg CO2e well-to-wake at GLEC v3.2 default factors. The same tonne by air emits 4,864 kg — roughly 193x the sea number.
Lane noteBackbone of the Asia-Pacific bulk trade. Capesize iron-ore bulkers running Port Hedland/Dampier-Qingdao dominate by tonnage; the containerised dairy and wool segment shown here is a fraction of total cargo on this corridor.
Per-tonne CO2e by mode
Sea freight
Container ship 4,000-7,000 TEU + Capesize bulkers
- Distance
- 8,400 km
- Factor (WTW)
- 3 g CO2e/tkm
- Per shipment
- 1 t × 8,400 km
- Factor source
- GLEC v3.2 Capesize dry bulk carrier (WTW)
Air freight
Long-haul belly cargo
- Distance
- 8,000 km
- Factor (WTW)
- 608 g CO2e/tkm
- Per shipment
- 1 t × 8,000 km
- Factor source
- GLEC v3.2 long-haul belly cargo allocation (WTW)
Mode comparison
On the Melbourne to Shanghai lane, air freight emits about 193 times more CO2e per tonne than sea freight at GLEC v3.2 defaults. The gap is driven by the WTW factor difference between long-haul belly cargo (608 g CO2e/tkm) and a Container ship 4,000-7,000 TEU + Capesize bulkers (3 g CO2e/tkm), partly offset by the shorter great-circle air routing.
Try this in the calculator
These numbers are GLEC v3.2 defaults at 1 tonne. Change weight, vessel class, or load factor in the calculator and see the per-mode CO2e update under ISO 14083:2023 data quality tiers.
Methodology references
- Methodology — GLEC v3.2 emission factors and ISO 14083 data quality tiers
- GLEC v3.2 in practice — three worked emission calculations
- Per-class container ship CO2 factors by TEU range
- What changed in GLEC v3.2 vs v3.0 and v3.1
- Glossary — WTW vs TTW vs WTT, ISO 14083 data quality tier definitions
- The 2026 State of Freight Emissions Report
- All trade-lane CO2 pages