- Home
- Lane emissions
- Jebel Ali to Hamburg
Jebel Ali to Hamburg freight CO2 emissions
One tonne of cargo shipped Jebel Ali (AEJEA) to Hamburg (DEHAM) by sea emits 90.8 kg CO2e well-to-wake at GLEC v3.2 default factors. The same tonne by air emits 2,918.4 kg — roughly 32x the sea number.
Lane noteGulf-North Europe routing transits Hormuz, Bab-el-Mandeb, and Suez before North Sea approach — Cape detour during Red Sea disruption adds ~5,000 km. Hamburg handles the bulk of UAE petrochemical and aluminium-into-Germany flows.
Per-tonne CO2e by mode
Sea freight
Container ship 8,000+ TEU
- Distance
- 12,100 km
- Factor (WTW)
- 7.5 g CO2e/tkm
- Per shipment
- 1 t × 12,100 km
- Factor source
- GLEC v3.2 container 8,000-15,000 TEU (Post-Panamax, WTW)
Air freight
Long-haul belly cargo
- Distance
- 4,800 km
- Factor (WTW)
- 608 g CO2e/tkm
- Per shipment
- 1 t × 4,800 km
- Factor source
- GLEC v3.2 long-haul belly cargo allocation (WTW)
Mode comparison
On the Jebel Ali to Hamburg lane, air freight emits about 32 times more CO2e per tonne than sea freight at GLEC v3.2 defaults. The gap is driven by the WTW factor difference between long-haul belly cargo (608 g CO2e/tkm) and a Container ship 8,000+ TEU (7.5 g CO2e/tkm), partly offset by the shorter great-circle air routing.
Try this in the calculator
These numbers are GLEC v3.2 defaults at 1 tonne. Change weight, vessel class, or load factor in the calculator and see the per-mode CO2e update under ISO 14083:2023 data quality tiers.
Methodology references
- Methodology — GLEC v3.2 emission factors and ISO 14083 data quality tiers
- GLEC v3.2 in practice — three worked emission calculations
- Per-class container ship CO2 factors by TEU range
- What changed in GLEC v3.2 vs v3.0 and v3.1
- Glossary — WTW vs TTW vs WTT, ISO 14083 data quality tier definitions
- The 2026 State of Freight Emissions Report
- All trade-lane CO2 pages