- Home
- Lane emissions
- Hong Kong to Memphis
Hong Kong to Memphis freight CO2 emissions
One tonne of cargo shipped Hong Kong (HKHKG) to Memphis (USMEM) by sea emits 123.8 kg CO2e well-to-wake at GLEC v3.2 default factors. The same tonne by air emits 11,228.8 kg — roughly 91x the sea number.
Lane noteFedEx World Hub at Memphis handles ~180 daily wide-body cargo movements; Hong Kong is one of its top three origin pairs by tonnage. This is the canonical lane for justifying air freight on time-sensitive electronics and pharma.
Per-tonne CO2e by mode
Sea freight
Container ship 8,000-14,000 TEU
- Distance
- 16,500 km
- Factor (WTW)
- 7.5 g CO2e/tkm
- Per shipment
- 1 t × 16,500 km
- Factor source
- GLEC v3.2 container 8,000-15,000 TEU (Post-Panamax, WTW)
Air freight
Boeing 777F / Boeing 747-8F
- Distance
- 12,760 km
- Factor (WTW)
- 880 g CO2e/tkm
- Per shipment
- 1 t × 12,760 km
- Factor source
- GLEC v3.2 dedicated freighter, long-haul (WTW)
Mode comparison
On the Hong Kong to Memphis lane, air freight emits about 91 times more CO2e per tonne than sea freight at GLEC v3.2 defaults. The gap is driven by the WTW factor difference between long-haul belly cargo (880 g CO2e/tkm) and a Container ship 8,000-14,000 TEU (7.5 g CO2e/tkm), partly offset by the shorter great-circle air routing.
Try this in the calculator
These numbers are GLEC v3.2 defaults at 1 tonne. Change weight, vessel class, or load factor in the calculator and see the per-mode CO2e update under ISO 14083:2023 data quality tiers.
Methodology references
- Methodology — GLEC v3.2 emission factors and ISO 14083 data quality tiers
- GLEC v3.2 in practice — three worked emission calculations
- Per-class container ship CO2 factors by TEU range
- What changed in GLEC v3.2 vs v3.0 and v3.1
- Glossary — WTW vs TTW vs WTT, ISO 14083 data quality tier definitions
- The 2026 State of Freight Emissions Report
- All trade-lane CO2 pages