- Home
- Lane emissions
- Hong Kong to Jeddah
Hong Kong to Jeddah freight CO2 emissions
One tonne of cargo shipped Hong Kong (HKHKG) to Jeddah (SAJED) by sea emits 85.5 kg CO2e well-to-wake at GLEC v3.2 default factors. The same tonne by air emits 4,778.9 kg — roughly 56x the sea number.
Lane noteAsia to Red Sea gateway via Malacca and Bab-el-Mandeb — Jeddah Islamic Port is the largest Saudi container facility. Houthi attacks have pushed some carriers to call Jeddah only via Suez southbound after Med calls rather than direct from Asia.
Per-tonne CO2e by mode
Sea freight
Container ship 8,000+ TEU
- Distance
- 11,400 km
- Factor (WTW)
- 7.5 g CO2e/tkm
- Per shipment
- 1 t × 11,400 km
- Factor source
- GLEC v3.2 container 8,000-15,000 TEU (Post-Panamax, WTW)
Air freight
Long-haul belly cargo
- Distance
- 7,860 km
- Factor (WTW)
- 608 g CO2e/tkm
- Per shipment
- 1 t × 7,860 km
- Factor source
- GLEC v3.2 long-haul belly cargo allocation (WTW)
Mode comparison
On the Hong Kong to Jeddah lane, air freight emits about 56 times more CO2e per tonne than sea freight at GLEC v3.2 defaults. The gap is driven by the WTW factor difference between long-haul belly cargo (608 g CO2e/tkm) and a Container ship 8,000+ TEU (7.5 g CO2e/tkm), partly offset by the shorter great-circle air routing.
Try this in the calculator
These numbers are GLEC v3.2 defaults at 1 tonne. Change weight, vessel class, or load factor in the calculator and see the per-mode CO2e update under ISO 14083:2023 data quality tiers.
Methodology references
- Methodology — GLEC v3.2 emission factors and ISO 14083 data quality tiers
- GLEC v3.2 in practice — three worked emission calculations
- Per-class container ship CO2 factors by TEU range
- What changed in GLEC v3.2 vs v3.0 and v3.1
- Glossary — WTW vs TTW vs WTT, ISO 14083 data quality tier definitions
- The 2026 State of Freight Emissions Report
- All trade-lane CO2 pages