<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
  xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>EcoFreight Blog — Freight Emissions, GLEC, ISO 14083</title>
    <link>https://ecofreight.co/blog</link>
    <description>Editorial on freight emissions methodology, sustainable logistics, regulatory compliance (CSRD, EU ETS, IMO CII), and carbon accounting — from the team building the EcoFreight CO2 emissions API.</description>
    <language>en</language>
    <atom:link href="https://ecofreight.co/rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <copyright>Copyright 2026 EcoFreight</copyright>
    <managingEditor>hello@ecofreight.co (EcoFreight)</managingEditor>
    <webMaster>hello@ecofreight.co (EcoFreight)</webMaster>
    <ttl>1440</ttl>

    <item>
      <title>FuelEU Maritime: how the pool penalty actually works (and what it costs in 2026)</title>
      <link>https://ecofreight.co/blog/fueleu-maritime-pool-explained</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://ecofreight.co/blog/fueleu-maritime-pool-explained</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Mayur Rawte</dc:creator>
      <author>mayur-rawte@ecofreight.co (Mayur Rawte)</author>
      <category>regulations</category>
      <description>FuelEU Maritime came into force 1 January 2025. The 2025 reporting year closes 31 December 2025; pooling submissions due 30 April 2026. Penalty: EUR 2,400 per tonne VLSFO-equivalent. For a 1,000-vessel European liner fleet running 3% over the cap, the modelled penalty is roughly EUR 178M before pooling relief.</description>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>What IMO MEPC 82 actually decided about shipping decarbonisation</title>
      <link>https://ecofreight.co/blog/imo-mepc-82-outcomes</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://ecofreight.co/blog/imo-mepc-82-outcomes</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Muhammad Ali</dc:creator>
      <author>muhammad-ali@ecofreight.co (Muhammad Ali)</author>
      <category>regulations</category>
      <description>MEPC 82 (Sept-Oct 2024) consolidated the mid-term measures debate; MEPC 83 (April 2025) formally adopted the combined GHG Fuel Standard plus remedial unit price framework. What is confirmed, what is still draft text, and the realistic 2026-2030 implementation timeline.</description>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Slow steaming: the actual math, not the press release</title>
      <link>https://ecofreight.co/blog/slow-steaming-actual-savings</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://ecofreight.co/blog/slow-steaming-actual-savings</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Muhammad Ali</dc:creator>
      <author>muhammad-ali@ecofreight.co (Muhammad Ali)</author>
      <category>logistics</category>
      <description>The cubic speed-fuel relationship derived from naval hydrodynamics. 8,500 TEU container ship dropping from 22 to 17 knots saves 43% of voyage fuel but costs USD 235,000 in inventory carry per voyage. The break-even bunker price, and where slow steaming pays vs where it breaks.</description>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Sustainable Aviation Fuel: the cost-per-tCO2-avoided math for 2026 freight</title>
      <link>https://ecofreight.co/blog/saf-supply-math</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://ecofreight.co/blog/saf-supply-math</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Yash Dhote</dc:creator>
      <author>yash-dhote@ecofreight.co (Yash Dhote)</author>
      <category>sustainability</category>
      <description>SAF sits at 0.3% of global jet fuel supply. ReFuelEU mandates 2% by 2025, 6% by 2030, 70% by 2050. Cost per tCO2-avoided: USD 300-800 for HEFA, USD 800-1,400 for synthetic. The honest take: SAF mandates are real, but SAF will not be the dominant aviation freight decarbonisation lever before 2035.</description>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Verra REDD+ credits in 2026: what changed after the 2023 Guardian investigation</title>
      <link>https://ecofreight.co/blog/verra-redd-credit-quality-review</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://ecofreight.co/blog/verra-redd-credit-quality-review</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Yash Dhote</dc:creator>
      <author>yash-dhote@ecofreight.co (Yash Dhote)</author>
      <category>sustainability</category>
      <description>The January 2023 Guardian / Die Zeit / SourceMaterial investigation found ~90% of audited REDD+ credits did not represent real reductions. Verra responded with new methodology VM0048. What VM0048 actually changes, what it does not, and what freight operators should buy if they want a credible offset claim.</description>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Freight emissions API vs SDK: when to use which, and what to ask vendors</title>
      <link>https://ecofreight.co/blog/api-vs-sdk-when-to-use-which</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://ecofreight.co/blog/api-vs-sdk-when-to-use-which</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Ahmed Shabib</dc:creator>
      <author>ahmed-shabib@ecofreight.co (Ahmed Shabib)</author>
      <category>technology</category>
      <description>Most vendors push SDKs because they make better case studies. For many freight integration patterns the raw REST API is what you actually want. When SDK is the right call, when it is not, and the six questions to ask any emissions vendor before signing.</description>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>GLEC Framework v3.2 vs UK DEFRA emission factors — which one to use when</title>
      <link>https://ecofreight.co/blog/glec-vs-defra-emission-factors</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://ecofreight.co/blog/glec-vs-defra-emission-factors</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Mayur Rawte</dc:creator>
      <author>mayur-rawte@ecofreight.co (Mayur Rawte)</author>
      <category>methodology</category>
      <description>DEFRA is simpler for UK-only SECR reporting. GLEC is the right base for any lane that crosses a border or any shipper that reports to CDP or CSRD. The 8% gap on UK heavy truck, the LNG and biofuel and reefer divergences, and my honest opinion on which way to point a calculator.</description>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>GLEC Framework vs ISO 14083:2023 — how they fit together, and what you have to choose between</title>
      <link>https://ecofreight.co/blog/glec-vs-iso-14083</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://ecofreight.co/blog/glec-vs-iso-14083</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Mayur Rawte</dc:creator>
      <author>mayur-rawte@ecofreight.co (Mayur Rawte)</author>
      <category>methodology</category>
      <description>GLEC is the factor table. ISO 14083 is the methodology. They sit on top of each other, not next to each other. What each one specifies, where they overlap, and what changes on the same shipment when you swap the methodology stack underneath the GLEC factors.</description>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>GLEC v3.0 vs v3.2 — what changed in the freight emission factor tables</title>
      <link>https://ecofreight.co/blog/glec-v3-0-vs-v3-2</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://ecofreight.co/blog/glec-v3-0-vs-v3-2</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Mayur Rawte</dc:creator>
      <author>mayur-rawte@ecofreight.co (Mayur Rawte)</author>
      <category>methodology</category>
      <description>If your calculator is on v3.0, what do your numbers do when you upgrade to v3.2? Same Shanghai-Rotterdam shipment in both versions, the percent move by mode, when to migrate, and whether to restate the prior year.</description>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Freight emissions API comparison 2026 — EcoFreight vs Climatiq vs Cloverly vs BigMile</title>
      <link>https://ecofreight.co/blog/freight-emissions-api-comparison</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://ecofreight.co/blog/freight-emissions-api-comparison</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Ahmed Shabib</dc:creator>
      <author>ahmed-shabib@ecofreight.co (Ahmed Shabib)</author>
      <category>technology</category>
      <description>I work on EcoFreight. Honest, biased-but-disclosed comparison of the freight emissions APIs I have integrated against — methodology, public pricing, latency, primary-data ingestion, and where each one actually wins.</description>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Scope 3 Category 4 freight emissions — a CDP-ready reporting guide for 2026</title>
      <link>https://ecofreight.co/blog/scope-3-cat-4-cdp-guide</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://ecofreight.co/blog/scope-3-cat-4-cdp-guide</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Yash Dhote</dc:creator>
      <author>yash-dhote@ecofreight.co (Yash Dhote)</author>
      <category>regulations</category>
      <description></description>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>CBAM 2026: the freight emissions data your EU importers will ask for</title>
      <link>https://ecofreight.co/blog/cbam-freight-2026</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://ecofreight.co/blog/cbam-freight-2026</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Mayur Rawte</dc:creator>
      <author>mayur-rawte@ecofreight.co (Mayur Rawte)</author>
      <category>regulations</category>
      <description>The CBAM definitive period began 1 January 2026. EU importers of steel, aluminium, cement, fertiliser, hydrogen, and electricity now buy carbon certificates against embedded emissions — including the freight leg. Here is what data your importer will ask for, with a worked EUR 1.5M example.</description>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>How much CO2 does a container ship emit per kilometre? Numbers by vessel class</title>
      <link>https://ecofreight.co/blog/container-ship-co2-per-km</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://ecofreight.co/blog/container-ship-co2-per-km</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Muhammad Ali</dc:creator>
      <author>muhammad-ali@ecofreight.co (Muhammad Ali)</author>
      <category>logistics</category>
      <description>A ULCV emits about 0.6 g CO2e per tonne-km laden. A 3,000-TEU feeder emits about 12 g. Two orders of magnitude apart. We break down the per-class numbers using GLEC v3.2 factors and the IMO Fourth GHG Study.</description>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>GLEC v3.2 in Detail: What Changed from v3.0 and v3.1, and What Changes Again in v4</title>
      <link>https://ecofreight.co/blog/glec-v3-2-explained</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://ecofreight.co/blog/glec-v3-2-explained</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Mayur Rawte</dc:creator>
      <author>mayur-rawte@ecofreight.co (Mayur Rawte)</author>
      <category>methodology</category>
      <description></description>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Suez, Panama, Hormuz: How Chokepoint Closures Spike Freight Emissions</title>
      <link>https://ecofreight.co/blog/shipping-route-disruptions</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://ecofreight.co/blog/shipping-route-disruptions</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Muhammad Ali</dc:creator>
      <author>muhammad-ali@ecofreight.co (Muhammad Ali)</author>
      <category>logistics</category>
      <description>When the Ever Given blocked the Suez Canal in 2021, ships rerouted via the Cape added 3,000+ nautical miles and roughly 300,000 tonnes of extra CO2. We break down the emission math for three major chokepoints.</description>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>GLEC v3.2 in Practice: Freight Emission Calculation with Worked Examples</title>
      <link>https://ecofreight.co/blog/how-we-calculate-emissions</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://ecofreight.co/blog/how-we-calculate-emissions</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Mayur Rawte</dc:creator>
      <author>mayur-rawte@ecofreight.co (Mayur Rawte)</author>
      <category>methodology</category>
      <description>We walk through three real emission calculations — a 40ft container Shanghai to Rotterdam, a truck from Munich to Milan, and an air cargo pallet LAX to Narita — showing every formula, factor, and assumption.</description>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>How ML Route Optimisation Cut Emissions 10-15% on Asia-Europe Lanes — and Where It Still Loses to Human Planners</title>
      <link>https://ecofreight.co/blog/ai-ml-supply-chain</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://ecofreight.co/blog/ai-ml-supply-chain</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Ahmed Shabib</dc:creator>
      <author>ahmed-shabib@ecofreight.co (Ahmed Shabib)</author>
      <category>technology</category>
      <description>I have shipped ML route optimisation into production on two carriers. The honest number is 10-15% on Asia-Europe — not 23%, not 50%. Here is what the model does, where it loses to a planner (cold start, port strikes, off-distribution typhoons), and what actually goes in the request.</description>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>EU ETS, CSRD, and IMO 2023: A Freight Compliance Checklist for 2026</title>
      <link>https://ecofreight.co/blog/regulatory-compliance</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://ecofreight.co/blog/regulatory-compliance</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Mayur Rawte</dc:creator>
      <author>mayur-rawte@ecofreight.co (Mayur Rawte)</author>
      <category>regulations</category>
      <description></description>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>From Spreadsheets to Real-Time: What Changes When You Automate Emission Tracking</title>
      <link>https://ecofreight.co/blog/real-time-carbon-tracking</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://ecofreight.co/blog/real-time-carbon-tracking</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Ahmed Shabib</dc:creator>
      <author>ahmed-shabib@ecofreight.co (Ahmed Shabib)</author>
      <category>technology</category>
      <description>Most companies still calculate freight emissions in Excel, quarterly, with 3-month-old data. An API-based approach gives you per-shipment numbers in milliseconds. We compare the two workflows and what switches when you make the move.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
